Thursday, November 28, 2013
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
ARCE/NC Lectures...
http://home.comcast.net/~hebsed/lectures.htm
For ARCE (American Research Center in Egypt, Northern CA / UC.B).
MC 2013.
For ARCE (American Research Center in Egypt, Northern CA / UC.B).
MC 2013.
Saturday, November 16, 2013
New JFK Theory...
My theory to the JFK Conspiracy Theories:
(c) Copyright 2013 Michael J. Costa, All rights reserved.
President Jack Kennedy was shot on November 22, 1963. It was said he was "assassinated" by Lee Harvey Oswald, who acted alone. Why? No one seems to know why, because his "assassin" was later shot himself, sealing the secrets with the dead. Culprits ranged from Fidel Castro, USSR, the CIA, or Mafia.
My theory is that it was NOT an Assassination.
JFK committed State-Assisted Suicide mostly for health reasons...
(He told the CIA to arrange this so he could "reincarnate someplace else and overthrow the USSR.")
JFK health problems, the suicide of Marylin Monroe and his own infidelities with other Hollywood women (whom Jacqueline didn't appreciate), and the stress of being on the spotlight with the Cuban Missile Crisis drove JFK to kill himself and blame it on the USSR.
In his next life, JFK overthrew the USSR, became a Writer, experimented with Psychic Warfare, and met Hollywood personalities online. His Camelot theme became a Micronation. Jacqueline's White House had the French Empire decor, a reference to a previous age. He even experienced MM's illness first hand, and became CTS by the CIA (who hoped no one would know this).
There you have it -- my new theory on JFK.
Life is the Continuation of the Soul, for the Soul never dies....
MC 2013.
(c) Copyright 2013 Michael J. Costa, All rights reserved.
President Jack Kennedy was shot on November 22, 1963. It was said he was "assassinated" by Lee Harvey Oswald, who acted alone. Why? No one seems to know why, because his "assassin" was later shot himself, sealing the secrets with the dead. Culprits ranged from Fidel Castro, USSR, the CIA, or Mafia.
My theory is that it was NOT an Assassination.
JFK committed State-Assisted Suicide mostly for health reasons...
(He told the CIA to arrange this so he could "reincarnate someplace else and overthrow the USSR.")
JFK health problems, the suicide of Marylin Monroe and his own infidelities with other Hollywood women (whom Jacqueline didn't appreciate), and the stress of being on the spotlight with the Cuban Missile Crisis drove JFK to kill himself and blame it on the USSR.
In his next life, JFK overthrew the USSR, became a Writer, experimented with Psychic Warfare, and met Hollywood personalities online. His Camelot theme became a Micronation. Jacqueline's White House had the French Empire decor, a reference to a previous age. He even experienced MM's illness first hand, and became CTS by the CIA (who hoped no one would know this).
There you have it -- my new theory on JFK.
Life is the Continuation of the Soul, for the Soul never dies....
MC 2013.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
On Micronations
https://www.createspace.com/3515837
https://www.createspace.com/4278767
http://micronations.webs.com/
Micronations traditionally are any self-declared State or developing Country.
Many mainstream nations were once Micronations; the USA is an example of this, having declared itself independent from England in 1776. I started a few Micronations myself since early College years. One of whom is the UEIR, a real nation based in the Egyptian Netherworld (that I discovered upon exiting my body prematurely since 1975). Others include the Pharaocracy of Niihau (Akua Niihau Pharaocracy), and the Provinces of the UEIR. I legally made a country merely by writing its existence in book form, like the US Constitution or other documents. Micronations come in many forms: some are fantasy creations, like Disneyland, or autonomous islands, or covers for secret societies or underground movements and illegal activity (Caliphate of Al Qaeda). Not all are well known. Some only exist on websites or in computer games. Others are media friendly.
My Micronations acquired recognition by many world governments, so are they still considered Micronations? I consider this the case based on size of the autonomous government not the population.
MC 2013.
https://www.createspace.com/4278767
http://micronations.webs.com/
Micronations traditionally are any self-declared State or developing Country.
Many mainstream nations were once Micronations; the USA is an example of this, having declared itself independent from England in 1776. I started a few Micronations myself since early College years. One of whom is the UEIR, a real nation based in the Egyptian Netherworld (that I discovered upon exiting my body prematurely since 1975). Others include the Pharaocracy of Niihau (Akua Niihau Pharaocracy), and the Provinces of the UEIR. I legally made a country merely by writing its existence in book form, like the US Constitution or other documents. Micronations come in many forms: some are fantasy creations, like Disneyland, or autonomous islands, or covers for secret societies or underground movements and illegal activity (Caliphate of Al Qaeda). Not all are well known. Some only exist on websites or in computer games. Others are media friendly.
My Micronations acquired recognition by many world governments, so are they still considered Micronations? I consider this the case based on size of the autonomous government not the population.
MC 2013.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Tutankhamon's mummy
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2485675/Mummy-fried-Tutankhamuns-body-spontaneously-combusted-INSIDE-coffin-following-botched-embalming-job-died-speeding-chariot-accident.html
The many theories about Tutankhamon are just that -- theories.
My Theory:
Whomever ripped open his chest looking for a valuable heart scarab [during embalming] probably torched his mummy to prevent his mummy from exacting revenge. Not a chariot accident or botched embalming! His chest, heart and scarab are all missing. The cut marks are from an inexperienced thief cutting open the chest searching for a heart scarab amulet, probably made of gold and precious stones... a cheap, black resin scarab (replacement) was found on top of his mummy, not inside it. Mummies are usually torched if violated.
(c) Copyright 2013 Michael J. Costa, all rights reserved.
MC 2013.
Post Script:
His leg injury occurs before the "chariot accident," so why would he be on a chariot if his leg was already broken? Chariots held 2 people, both standing. If he was riding ahead and fell off, his charioteers behind him would have collided into him, not from riding ahead in the thick of battle where people are fighting each other, giving no room for movement. Was there any damage done to his golden or wooden chariots (in the tomb)? One was the driver, the other the passenger with bow and arrow; in the chest from his tomb, we see Tut with the reins tied behind him, riding alone. Chariots did not have shock absorbers; if you run over a small 5 inch stone, you fall off. The same with corpses. Why would someone intentionally run him down? Ay who became Pharaoh after Tut, did not wage war on the Hittites or anyone, if for revenge for Tut's chariot-accident theory. Burning his corpse after death would be to stop decomposition on the field of battle, with added perfumes to stop the stench of death, not a 'botched embalming.'
MC 2013.
The many theories about Tutankhamon are just that -- theories.
My Theory:
Whomever ripped open his chest looking for a valuable heart scarab [during embalming] probably torched his mummy to prevent his mummy from exacting revenge. Not a chariot accident or botched embalming! His chest, heart and scarab are all missing. The cut marks are from an inexperienced thief cutting open the chest searching for a heart scarab amulet, probably made of gold and precious stones... a cheap, black resin scarab (replacement) was found on top of his mummy, not inside it. Mummies are usually torched if violated.
(c) Copyright 2013 Michael J. Costa, all rights reserved.
MC 2013.
Post Script:
His leg injury occurs before the "chariot accident," so why would he be on a chariot if his leg was already broken? Chariots held 2 people, both standing. If he was riding ahead and fell off, his charioteers behind him would have collided into him, not from riding ahead in the thick of battle where people are fighting each other, giving no room for movement. Was there any damage done to his golden or wooden chariots (in the tomb)? One was the driver, the other the passenger with bow and arrow; in the chest from his tomb, we see Tut with the reins tied behind him, riding alone. Chariots did not have shock absorbers; if you run over a small 5 inch stone, you fall off. The same with corpses. Why would someone intentionally run him down? Ay who became Pharaoh after Tut, did not wage war on the Hittites or anyone, if for revenge for Tut's chariot-accident theory. Burning his corpse after death would be to stop decomposition on the field of battle, with added perfumes to stop the stench of death, not a 'botched embalming.'
MC 2013.
Friday, November 1, 2013
Coming Soon...
I decided to make a series from my novel "Phrenland"
The first two books, "Phrenland" and "The Lotus: Lord of the United States" will have a new novel that connects the two stories together. I am currently working on it.
"Phrenland" is a story about Espionage, Dimensions, and Counter intelligence.
"The Lotus: Lord of the US" concerns itself with the origins of a new hero and the cure to his condition (as well as exposing his only weakness).
Both are of the "action/adventure" genre.
MC 2013.
The first two books, "Phrenland" and "The Lotus: Lord of the United States" will have a new novel that connects the two stories together. I am currently working on it.
"Phrenland" is a story about Espionage, Dimensions, and Counter intelligence.
"The Lotus: Lord of the US" concerns itself with the origins of a new hero and the cure to his condition (as well as exposing his only weakness).
Both are of the "action/adventure" genre.
MC 2013.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)