http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2485675/Mummy-fried-Tutankhamuns-body-spontaneously-combusted-INSIDE-coffin-following-botched-embalming-job-died-speeding-chariot-accident.html
The many theories about Tutankhamon are just that -- theories.
My Theory:
Whomever ripped open his chest looking for a valuable heart scarab [during embalming] probably torched his mummy to prevent his mummy from exacting revenge. Not a chariot accident or botched embalming! His chest, heart and scarab are all missing. The cut marks are from an inexperienced thief cutting open the chest searching for a heart scarab amulet, probably made of gold and precious stones... a cheap, black resin scarab (replacement) was found on top of his mummy, not inside it. Mummies are usually torched if violated.
(c) Copyright 2013 Michael J. Costa, all rights reserved.
MC 2013.
Post Script:
His leg injury occurs before the "chariot accident," so why would he be on a chariot if his leg was already broken? Chariots held 2 people, both standing. If he was riding ahead and fell off, his charioteers behind him would have collided into him, not from riding ahead in the thick of battle where people are fighting each other, giving no room for movement. Was there any damage done to his golden or wooden chariots (in the tomb)? One was the driver, the other the passenger with bow and arrow; in the chest from his tomb, we see Tut with the reins tied behind him, riding alone. Chariots did not have shock absorbers; if you run over a small 5 inch stone, you fall off. The same with corpses. Why would someone intentionally run him down? Ay who became Pharaoh after Tut, did not wage war on the Hittites or anyone, if for revenge for Tut's chariot-accident theory. Burning his corpse after death would be to stop decomposition on the field of battle, with added perfumes to stop the stench of death, not a 'botched embalming.'
MC 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment