For the book "The Wadjet-Man: The Future Adventures of Alexander the Great" (Novel, Action & Adventure), I originally planned to include illustrations in A.I. but after seeing the "legality issues of A.I. Art" I declined. Amazon said I would need the Copyright for those images even though the website said such images are in the Public Domain. Not wanting to risk that issue, I added a Public Domain image not AI for the cover, with some added features also PD.
I read about how one author used AI for Art in his book and that it "upset Artists" because they had their art "manipulated by computer." The computers in AI use a collage effect, mixing images together into a composite.
The following was a quote from that original version of my book:
"In
A.I. Art, someone else makes the paint and you, the user, takes
the paint and creates a painting. Just
as the base images in a Photo-mosaic are another’s image, the ending result is
a separate image. If one
photographs a statue does the person own the image, or does the sculptor own
it? Does the culture that produced the sculptor own the statue’s origins? Does
a current Nation own that culture, or does the reincarnated original culture
own it? Does a computer that reorganizes
the images into a new form own the image? Or does the programmer own the image?
Discuss this in Society."
MC 2023.
No comments:
Post a Comment